/Research Database
← Research Database
Sehr niedrigSystematic ReviewMensch2025

Transitioning care in cystic fibrosis: a comprehensive review of reviews of clinical and psychosocial outcomes.

Abdullah Alzayed

Kernaussage

Structured transition models, particularly those involving joint clinics and transition coordinators, demonstrate improvements in self-management, adherence, patient satisfaction, and preserved lung function (FEV1) for adolescents and young adults with cystic fibrosis.

Abstract

With rising life expectancy in cystic fibrosis (CF), effective transition from pediatric to adult care is essential. Structured transition models are thought to improve continuity of care, clinical stability, and psychosocial outcomes. This review of reviews synthesizes systematic review evidence on the effectiveness of these models across healthcare systems. Reviews and systematic reviews with or without meta-analysis published between 2005 and 2025 were identified through comprehensive searches. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and primary study overlap was quantified using the Corrected Covered Area (CCA). A narrative synthesis was conducted for all included reviews, stratified by intervention type and geography. Structured programs consistently outperformed informal approaches. Joint pediatric-adult clinics were associated with preserved lung function and fewer hospitalizations. The use of readiness tools, such as the Transition Readiness Assessment Questionnaire, showed improvement in self-management skills. Transition coordinators enhanced adherence and improved patient satisfaction with care. Evidence was limited regarding the long-term impact on mortality or transplant status. Structured transition models, particularly those incorporating joint clinics and coordinator-led care, are effective in improving self-management, adherence, and continuity of care for adolescents and young adults with CF. Future systematic reviews should focus on synthesizing evidence for long-term clinical outcomes. https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?ID=CRD42025214760, PROSPERO CRD42025214760.

Kein medizinischer Rat. Die dargestellten Studien dienen der wissenschaftlichen Information und ersetzen keine ärztliche Beratung. Bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wende dich an eine approbierte Ärztin oder einen Arzt.

Quelle: PubMed Central / National Library of Medicine (NLM). Apollion steht in keiner Verbindung mit NLM und wird von NLM nicht empfohlen. Evidenzgrade bewerten die methodische Studienqualität — nicht die inhaltliche Richtigkeit.

Lizenz: CC BY — Inhalte werden ausschließlich aus Open-Access-Quellen mit kommerziell nutzbaren Lizenzen (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA) indexiert.