Health associations of various fruit forms: solid fruits, juices, and smoothies.
Shubhreet Bhullar
Kernaussage
Fruit smoothie consumption was associated with the most favorable health outcomes, including lower hypertension, fewer mental health struggles, and higher energy levels, while fruit juice consumption was linked to poorer outcomes such as higher high cholesterol and lower sleep quality.
Abstract
The rising prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) highlights the need for refined dietary recommendations that distinguish between forms of fruit consumption. This study examines the associations between solid fruits, fruit juices, and fruit smoothies with various health outcomes. A cross-sectional survey ( N = 443) collected self-reported dietary, health, and demographic data, categorizing participants into four groups: low fruit consumers, fruit juice consumers, solid fruit consumers, and fruit smoothie consumers. Results revealed notable differences in health outcomes. The fruit smoothies group demonstrated the best overall health, with the lowest hypertension prevalence (18.60%), lowest frequency of mental health struggles (12.79%), and highest self-rated energy levels (4.51 ± 0.70). In contrast, the fruit juices group had the poorest outcomes, including the highest high cholesterol prevalence (39.18%) and lowest self-rated sleep quality (2.95 ± 0.85). Low fruit consumers had the highest cardiovascular disease rates (16.17%) and most physician visits (5.48 ± 1.01). While self-reported data and potential confounders pose limitations, findings underscore the need to differentiate fruit consumption types in dietary guidelines. Retaining fiber while enhancing nutrient bioavailability, fruit smoothies may offer unique health benefits. Future longitudinal studies are needed to establish causality and refine dietary recommendations for public health.
Kein medizinischer Rat. Die dargestellten Studien dienen der wissenschaftlichen Information und ersetzen keine ärztliche Beratung. Bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wende dich an eine approbierte Ärztin oder einen Arzt.
Quelle: PubMed Central / National Library of Medicine (NLM). Apollion steht in keiner Verbindung mit NLM und wird von NLM nicht empfohlen. Evidenzgrade bewerten die methodische Studienqualität — nicht die inhaltliche Richtigkeit.
Lizenz: CC BY — Inhalte werden ausschließlich aus Open-Access-Quellen mit kommerziell nutzbaren Lizenzen (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA) indexiert.