Machine learning-driven analysis of feed additives and intestinal microbiota diversity in broiler chickens: Clustering of mineral profiles and predictive diet modeling.
Lyubov Sergeevna Grishina, Arthur Yurievich Zhigalov, Irina Pavlovna Bolodurina, Alexander Evgenievich Shukhman et al.
Kernaussage
Machine learning effectively identified six distinct broiler groups based on mineral profiles, with cobalt, zinc, strontium, arsenic, and lithium as key differentiating biomarkers, and a Decision Tree classifier achieved 74% accuracy in predicting diet types from microbiota data.
Abstract
The gut microbiota of broilers plays a pivotal role in nutrient absorption, immune modulation, and mineral metabolism. Feed additives can influence these microbial and physiological processes, yet their integrated effects remain insufficiently understood. This study aimed to intelligently evaluate the impact of various feed additives on the intestinal microbiota and mineral composition of broiler chickens and to develop machine learning (ML) models for clustering and classification of diet-associated mineral and microbial profiles. A total of 385 Arbor Acres broilers (7 days old) were allocated into 11 groups, including one control semi-synthetic diet (SSD), one group with a semi-synthetic deficient diet (SSDD), and nine experimental groups receiving SSDD with different additives: Probiotics (Soya-bifidum and Sporobacterin), dietary fibers (cellulose, lactulose, and chitosan), enterosorbents (enterosgel and activated carbon), and ultrafine particles (UFPs) (Cu and Fe). Microbiota composition was assessed by 16S ribosomal RNA sequencing, and body mineral composition was determined through inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometer. To overcome data scarcity, synthetic records were generated using conditional tabular generative adversarial networks. K-means and hierarchical agglomerative clustering were used for mineral profile grouping, while logistic regression, SVM, and decision tree models classified diet types. Hierarchical clustering revealed six distinct mineral profile groups (Silhouette = 0.524), with SSD and SSDD forming separate clusters. Feed additives such as UFPs, chitosan, and activated carbon induced similar mineral patterns. Key differentiating biomarkers were cobalt, zinc, strontium, arsenic, and lithium (p < 0.05). The decision tree classifier achieved 74% accuracy in predicting diet types based on microbiota data. Alpha diversity analysis showed enhanced microbial richness in groups fed lactulose, enterosgel, cellulose, or activated carbon. ML effectively elucidated complex relationships between diet, microbiota composition, and mineral metabolism in broilers. The integration of clustering and predictive models demonstrates the feasibility of intelligent feeding systems tailored to optimize gut health and nutrient utilization. Future studies integrating multi-omics data and broader farm-level validation will strengthen precision nutrition frameworks for sustainable poultry production.
Kein medizinischer Rat. Die dargestellten Studien dienen der wissenschaftlichen Information und ersetzen keine ärztliche Beratung. Bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wende dich an eine approbierte Ärztin oder einen Arzt.
Quelle: PubMed Central / National Library of Medicine (NLM). Apollion steht in keiner Verbindung mit NLM und wird von NLM nicht empfohlen. Evidenzgrade bewerten die methodische Studienqualität — nicht die inhaltliche Richtigkeit.
Lizenz: CC BY — Inhalte werden ausschließlich aus Open-Access-Quellen mit kommerziell nutzbaren Lizenzen (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA) indexiert.