Protein Adequacy in Europe: Adjusting Crude Intakes Using the Protein Adequacy and Quality Score (PAQS).
Samantha Nikita Heerschop, Sander Biesbroek, Merel Celine Daas, Anneleen Kuijsten et al.
Kernaussage
Current diets in healthy European adults do not raise immediate concerns for utilizable protein intake, although females in Germany show a higher prevalence of inadequacy.
Abstract
Because of high overall protein intakes and the substantial proportion of animal-based protein in Europe, protein quality was not considered an issue. However, this may become important when moving toward more sustainable diets that include more plant protein. To facilitate the assessment of protein adequacy while considering protein quality, this study aimed to provide an overview of current protein intake and adequacy in European adults, based on crude and utilizable protein. To assess the prevalence of inadequate protein intake in Europe, the Protein Adequacy and Quality Score (PAQS) was developed and applied to adults (18-64 y) of 25 national dietary surveys obtained from the Comprehensive European Food Consumption Database of the European Food Safety Authority. The PAQS assesses protein adequacy as the ratio of daily utilizable protein intake to requirement, with utilizable protein calculated on a meal basis by considering protein digestibility, indispensable amino acid requirements, and crude protein intake. When accounting for energy misreporting, within-subject variation, and nonnormality of the intake distribution, the prevalence of crude protein inadequacy was <1% in both sexes. Utilizable protein inadequacy ranged from 0% (Spain) to 7% (Austria) in females, except for Germany (17%), and from 0% (Montenegro) to 6% (Germany) in males. These findings suggest no immediate concern for healthy adults regarding utilizable protein intake of current diets. However, diets of females in Germany may warrant closer attention.
Kein medizinischer Rat. Die dargestellten Studien dienen der wissenschaftlichen Information und ersetzen keine ärztliche Beratung. Bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wende dich an eine approbierte Ärztin oder einen Arzt.
Quelle: PubMed Central / National Library of Medicine (NLM). Apollion steht in keiner Verbindung mit NLM und wird von NLM nicht empfohlen. Evidenzgrade bewerten die methodische Studienqualität — nicht die inhaltliche Richtigkeit.
Lizenz: CC BY — Inhalte werden ausschließlich aus Open-Access-Quellen mit kommerziell nutzbaren Lizenzen (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA) indexiert.