The impact of supplementing quebracho and chestnut tannin extracts on the growth performance in growing and finishing beef cattle: a meta-analytical assessment.
Mingyung Lee, Luis O Tedeschi
Kernaussage
Tannin extract supplementation was associated with increased average daily gain (ADG) in a nonlinear, dose-dependent pattern, peaking at approximately 0.30% of dietary dry matter, with positive responses also observed at 0.08% in some subsets, and these responses were context-dependent, with larger effects observed at lower protein intake and/or with monensin.
Abstract
Tannin extracts (TE), composed of condensed tannins from quebracho and hydrolyzable tannins from chestnut, have been studied as functional feed additives to improve growth performance in beef cattle, but reported effects vary with TE composition, dose, dietary protein, and co-additive. This meta-analysis evaluated TE supplementation effects on average daily gain (ADG), dry matter intake (DMI), and gain:feed (G:F) in growing and finishing beef cattle, using 162 treatment records from 43 published studies involving > 22,000 animals, mostly bulls and feedlot-based studies, including grazing and individually pen trials. Additional analyses included conditional independence tests for monensin use, forest and mosaic plots, and subset analyses for diets with or without monensin. Meta-regression indicated that TE supplementation was associated with increases in ADG (P < 0.001), DMI (P < 0.001), and G:F (P = 0.024). The ADG response was nonlinear; quadratic models indicated an optimal inclusion of ∼0.30% of dietary DM for maximizing weight gain. The disproportionate increase in ADG relative to DMI is consistent with improved nutrient utilization. The TE-ADG relationship was stronger at lower crude protein intake (P = 0.0525), however, because crude protein intake is not a direct proxy for rumen-degradable nitrogen supply and may co-vary with diet formulation and co-additives (e.g., ionophores and/or NPN sources), this pattern should be interpreted as context-dependent rather than as evidence of a universal mechanism. A conditional independence test also suggested that the TE-associated ADG responses were not independent of monensin use, suggesting a possible synergy effect, though additional studies are needed to confirm this pattern. Overall, TE appears to be a context-dependent additive rather than a universal growth promoter, and responses did not necessarily require doses near the model-derived optimum; benefits were also detectable at lower inclusions (e.g., ∼0.08% of dietary DM) in some contexts. Further research is needed to refine dosing strategies, better characterize TE chemistry, and evaluate environmental outcomes in dedicated studies. This study examined whether tannin extracts (natural compounds derived from quebracho and chestnut trees) can help beef cattle grow more efficiently. Tannins are known to interact with dietary proteins, sometimes reducing waste and improving nutrient use, but past research has yielded mixed results. To get a clearer picture, the authors combined data from 43 studies involving over 22,000 cattle. They found that supplementing with tannins improved weight gain, but the effect was not a simple case of “more is better.” Instead, the analysis identified an optimal inclusion level, with the greatest benefits observed when tannins were included at approximately 0.30% of dietary dry matter. Importantly, the animals did not eat more feed, indicating that the improvement came from using nutrients more efficiently rather than simply eating more. The study also showed that responses to dietary tannins were more frequently positive when the diet was low in protein or when fed together with monensin, a common feed additive. Tannin extracts are considered growth promoters, but they may offer additional benefits under certain feeding conditions.
Kein medizinischer Rat. Die dargestellten Studien dienen der wissenschaftlichen Information und ersetzen keine ärztliche Beratung. Bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wende dich an eine approbierte Ärztin oder einen Arzt.
Quelle: PubMed Central / National Library of Medicine (NLM). Apollion steht in keiner Verbindung mit NLM und wird von NLM nicht empfohlen. Evidenzgrade bewerten die methodische Studienqualität — nicht die inhaltliche Richtigkeit.
Lizenz: CC BY — Inhalte werden ausschließlich aus Open-Access-Quellen mit kommerziell nutzbaren Lizenzen (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA) indexiert.