/Research Database
← Research Database
ModeratQuerschnittMensch2026

Dietary Behavior Clustering and Cardiovascular Risk Markers in a Large Population Cohort.

Mauro Lombardo, Giovanni Aulisa, Fares M S Muthanna, Sercan Karav et al.

Kernaussage

Distinct behavioral eating profiles are strongly associated with body composition and cardiovascular-related eating patterns, with structured/mindful eaters exhibiting healthier anthropometrics and greater adherence to cardioprotective food preferences, while disordered eaters showed unfavorable profiles.

Abstract

Eating habits influence cardiometabolic health alongside traditional dietary measures. However, the links between dietary patterns, body composition, and heart-healthy food preferences remain under-explored in large cohorts. In this cross-sectional study, 2461 adults (aged 18 to 75 years) completed an online survey on eating behaviors, food preferences, and lifestyle. Principal component analysis (PCA) of seven behaviors identified dietary profiles. A heart-healthy diet score (range -2 to 10; higher = greater preference for fruit, vegetables, legumes, fish, and less meat/processed meat) was derived from these food preferences. ANOVA and adjusted regressions linked the profiles to BMI, fat mass, waist circumference, and diet score. Four profiles emerged: structured, social, irregular, and disordered eaters. Structured eaters had the lowest BMI (26.8 ± 5.1 kg/m 2 ), lowest fat mass (28.9 ± 9.4%), and highest dietary score (4.73 ± 2.0). Disorganized eaters had the highest BMI (29.0 ± 5.5 kg/m 2 ), the highest fat mass (31.2 ± 8.8%) and the lowest score (3.93 ± 2.0); all p < 0.05. Dose-response analyses confirmed that greater disordered eating (PCA1) was associated with worse outcomes. Dietary profiles are associated with body composition and cardioprotective preferences. Behavioral assessment could refine the identification of cardiometabolic risk and personalize nutrition.

Kein medizinischer Rat. Die dargestellten Studien dienen der wissenschaftlichen Information und ersetzen keine ärztliche Beratung. Bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wende dich an eine approbierte Ärztin oder einen Arzt.

Quelle: PubMed Central / National Library of Medicine (NLM). Apollion steht in keiner Verbindung mit NLM und wird von NLM nicht empfohlen. Evidenzgrade bewerten die methodische Studienqualität — nicht die inhaltliche Richtigkeit.

Lizenz: CC BY — Inhalte werden ausschließlich aus Open-Access-Quellen mit kommerziell nutzbaren Lizenzen (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA) indexiert.