/Research Database
← Research Database
Sehr niedrig2026

Tobacco, biological aging and epigenetic resilience: the Andorran paradox.

Pooja Reddy, Dhairya Nanavaty, Pradeepkumar Devarakonda, Pedro Moreno

Kernaussage

The Andorran paradox, characterized by high smoking rates and long life expectancy, suggests that protective factors within Andorra's exposome may buffer the detrimental effects of smoking on biological aging.

Abstract

Longevity is not solely determined by the absence of risk factors but often reflects the balance between harmful exposures and protective adaptations. We introduce the framework of epigenetic resilience as a counterbalancing mechanism by which favorable environmental and lifestyle factors can potentially offset detrimental influences such as tobacco use. Tobacco is a well-established accelerator of biological aging through adverse epigenetic reprogramming, yet populations such as Andorra paradoxically exhibit both high smoking prevalence and some of the longest life expectancies worldwide. This observation underscores the potential role of resilience factors-including diet, physical activity, psychosocial cohesion, and environmental context-that may buffer or counteract the negative epigenetic imprints of smoking. By highlighting this paradox, we emphasize the importance of understanding how protective influences reshape DNA methylation landscapes to sustain healthspan despite harmful exposures. Recognizing and enhancing epigenetic resilience might offer a path toward targeted interventions that could mitigate the consequences of tobacco and other stressors, ultimately informing strategies to promote healthy aging at both individual and population levels.

Kein medizinischer Rat. Die dargestellten Studien dienen der wissenschaftlichen Information und ersetzen keine ärztliche Beratung. Bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wende dich an eine approbierte Ärztin oder einen Arzt.

Quelle: PubMed Central / National Library of Medicine (NLM). Apollion steht in keiner Verbindung mit NLM und wird von NLM nicht empfohlen. Evidenzgrade bewerten die methodische Studienqualität — nicht die inhaltliche Richtigkeit.

Lizenz: CC BY — Inhalte werden ausschließlich aus Open-Access-Quellen mit kommerziell nutzbaren Lizenzen (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA) indexiert.