Age-related differences and common pathways of lymphocyte subsets in sepsis: a comparative review of elderly and pediatric patients.
Xianwen Wang, Qihang Huang, Zhihong Zuo, Zhanwen Wang et al.
Kernaussage
Sepsis impacts lymphocyte subsets differently in elderly and pediatric patients due to their distinct baseline immune states (immunosenescence vs. immunoimmaturity), leading to divergent pathways of immune dysfunction and recovery potential, although both extremes can converge on an immunoparalysis-like phenotype.
Abstract
Sepsis disproportionately affects older adults and children, two immunologically vulnerable extremes of age. Yet sepsis is superimposed on distinct baselines-immunosenescence in the elderly and immune immaturity in neonates and young children-leading to different pathways toward immune failure. This comparative narrative review synthesizes clinical and experimental evidence on age-specific and shared alterations in lymphocyte subsets in sepsis, including lymphopenia; CD4 + and CD8 + T cell activation, apoptosis, and exhaustion; B cell depletion and impaired antibody production; NK cell cytotoxic defects; and dynamic regulatory circuits such as Tregs. Recognizing that early organ injury is initiated and amplified primarily by innate immune programs, we frame lymphocyte injury largely as a downstream cost of the acute host-response milieu that can become rate-limiting for immune recovery, secondary infections, and late mortality. We highlight convergent phenotypes linked to secondary infections and late mortality, while emphasizing differences in kinetics, mechanisms, and recovery potential. We propose an age-stratified approach to serial immune monitoring and biomarker-enriched trial design to guide immunoadjuvant therapies and avoid one-size-fits-all immunomodulation. Clarifying these trajectories may improve risk stratification and outcomes across the lifespan.
Kein medizinischer Rat. Die dargestellten Studien dienen der wissenschaftlichen Information und ersetzen keine ärztliche Beratung. Bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wende dich an eine approbierte Ärztin oder einen Arzt.
Quelle: PubMed Central / National Library of Medicine (NLM). Apollion steht in keiner Verbindung mit NLM und wird von NLM nicht empfohlen. Evidenzgrade bewerten die methodische Studienqualität — nicht die inhaltliche Richtigkeit.
Lizenz: CC BY — Inhalte werden ausschließlich aus Open-Access-Quellen mit kommerziell nutzbaren Lizenzen (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA) indexiert.