The investigation and analysis of nutritional iron deficiency anaemia in Kazakh children.
Yu Wei, Jianghong Wang, Feng Wang, Xu Wang et al.
Kernaussage
The prevalence of nutritional iron deficiency anaemia in Kazakh children aged 3-14 years in Barkol County was 15.7%, with lower meat and aquatic product intake, and failure to take iron supplements identified as independent risk factors.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate nutritional iron deficiency anaemia (IDA) in Kazakh children. In this cross-sectional study, a total of 197 children aged 3-14 years were randomly selected from three townships in Barkol County, and the basic information and diet of the sample children were collected and analysed. The overall prevalence of IDA was 15.7%, which is considerably higher than the national average for children in China. Kazakh children had a significantly higher prevalence of anaemia than their Han counterparts ( p = 0.040). To ensure statistical stability given the sample size, a parsimonious multivariate logistic regression model was employed. This model identified lower intake of meat [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.92], lower intake of aquatic products (aOR = 0.35), and failure to take iron supplements (aOR = 5.10) as independent risk factors for IDA. The findings indicate a substantial burden of IDA among Kazakh children in this region, highlighting a significant ethnic disparity. The primary modifiable risk factors are dietary, centring on insufficient consumption of bioavailable iron from animal sources and aquatic products, coupled with a lack of iron supplementation. The counterintuitive association between soybean/nut intake and IDA risk warrants further investigation. These results underscore the urgent need for targeted nutritional interventions and health education programmes focused on improving dietary iron quality and supplementation practices in this population.
Kein medizinischer Rat. Die dargestellten Studien dienen der wissenschaftlichen Information und ersetzen keine ärztliche Beratung. Bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wende dich an eine approbierte Ärztin oder einen Arzt.
Quelle: PubMed Central / National Library of Medicine (NLM). Apollion steht in keiner Verbindung mit NLM und wird von NLM nicht empfohlen. Evidenzgrade bewerten die methodische Studienqualität — nicht die inhaltliche Richtigkeit.
Lizenz: CC BY — Inhalte werden ausschließlich aus Open-Access-Quellen mit kommerziell nutzbaren Lizenzen (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA) indexiert.