Quantitative genetics of trauma induced mortality in Drosophila melanogaster.
Gwanwoou Yun, Ronchen Liu, Nathaniel P Sharp
Kernaussage
Mortality following traumatic injury in *Drosophila* exhibits substantial additive genetic variation and condition-dependence, with genotypes having higher mortality also showing lower viability, fecundity, and lifespan.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury is a major cause of chronic neurological impairment worldwide, and there is evidence that both genetic and environmental variation contribute to the likelihood of recovery. Using an insect model of traumatic brain injury, we examined variation in the risk of mortality using quantitative genetic approaches applied previously for life history traits in Drosophila melanogaster. We quantified additive genetic variance for mortality risk using a controlled breeding design and found levels of variation consistent with existing data on major fitness components. We did not detect inbreeding depression for mortality risk, suggesting that this trait is not strongly affected by recessive deleterious alleles. To explain the high level of standing genetic variation, we considered whether mortality risk depends on the metabolic resources available to an individual, also known as "condition". We manipulated condition by inducing random mutations and by restricting calories during larval development. We found that reduced condition due to both random mutations and resource limitation significantly increased the risk of mortality following trauma. Among inbred lines, greater mortality risk was associated with lower viability, fecundity and longevity, consistent with an effect of genome-wide genetic quality. Our results suggest that further consideration of individual condition would be valuable for understanding and predicting variation in the outcomes of traumatic brain injury.
Kein medizinischer Rat. Die dargestellten Studien dienen der wissenschaftlichen Information und ersetzen keine ärztliche Beratung. Bei gesundheitlichen Fragen wende dich an eine approbierte Ärztin oder einen Arzt.
Quelle: PubMed Central / National Library of Medicine (NLM). Apollion steht in keiner Verbindung mit NLM und wird von NLM nicht empfohlen. Evidenzgrade bewerten die methodische Studienqualität — nicht die inhaltliche Richtigkeit.
Lizenz: CC BY — Inhalte werden ausschließlich aus Open-Access-Quellen mit kommerziell nutzbaren Lizenzen (CC0, CC BY, CC BY-SA) indexiert.